Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Daily Patrick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--JForget 00:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Daily Patrick

The Daily Patrick (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Borderline A7 candidate: although I would argue it's claim at the beginning is enough to scrape by. Even so, it provides no proof that this is true anyway, and is biased. Probably borderline G11 with a COI, too, but it's not really blatant advertising... Google shows errr... not much, "daily patrick" north carolina shows nothing relevent. Otherwise fails WP:N/WP:CORP. Strong delete, as it can't quite be speedied. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 19:06, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete If it really is an influential newspaper that grew into a website, as the article claims, then it's a bit weird that the website is a 12yo's blog. That said, Broad Creek, North Carolina seems to have a serious problem with duck-feeding. Thomjakobsen 19:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, no attribution of notability to independent sources. --Dhartung | Talk 20:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable nonsense, unless the Clarksons (the basic topic of this "newspaper") are really that infuential in...what is it? Broad Creek,NC?--Sethacus 22:37, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Far too trivial. • Lawrence Cohen 13:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as too short to establish notability. --Gavin Collins 15:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I need more data to show me why this is notable. ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 16:52, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.