Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Curse of King Clancy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete.  RasputinAXP  c 20:37, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Curse of King Clancy

Another curse that's complete made-up nonsense. BoojiBoy 04:05, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete or, if you must, Merge it into a team or player article - Richfife 04:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete 24 Google hits, almost all mirrors. --djrobgordon 04:20, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete if not verified, else keep. --Snarius 04:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep sens fans speak up, the curse is real --canadian_bacon 04:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

This comment is canadian_bacon's first edit. --djrobgordon 05:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Yet another Curse of the Bambino emulation. What is going on today? Nonsense article.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:22, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Transcript. It predates the article by 2 yearsReference to a newspaper article from 2004--Zegoma beach 14:08, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Since it's verifiable, add proof/documentation to the page and withdraw nomination. BoojiBoy 14:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
  • After some thought, changing my vote back. BoojiBoy 02:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. One newspaper article by a bored reporter does not make it notable. Ted 15:00, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Even if the Clancy quote is accurate, I don't see why it can't be merged into his article. --djrobgordon 16:04, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I would prefer that the article about a notable ice hockey legend not be cluttered up with hocus-pocus myself. BoojiBoy 16:27, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete One newspaper reference or not, it's still non-notable. I can dig up hundreds of newspaper obituaries, but I wouldn't want an article on each of them. -- Kicking222 17:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• delete one newspaper article and some chatroom discussion doesn't make it notable --Samael775 20:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Why are so many of these showing up today? - Kookykman|(t)e 21:05, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.