Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Creep (Comics)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:16, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Creep (Comics)

The Creep (Comics) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Prodded this article about a comic book on 8/14 with the reason: "No reliable sources establishing notability. Article also has biased, advertising tone." Prod removed on 8/16; defense on Talk page consisted of "There are lots of articles about comic series; this article is within the scope of WikiProject:Comics; the tone will eventually be fixed." The problems with the tone are obvious and nobody's made any attempt at improvement since the article was tagged in January (or since it was prodded). I couldn't find any reliable information on Google to show this is a notable comic, but "The Creep" is not the easiest search term to target. Propaniac 17:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment While struggling to figure out why my AFD wasn't posting correctly, I noticed that The Creep (comics) redirects to a list of minor Judge Dredd characters; that seems to be a different Creep. Propaniac 17:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment it is. I suspect it might be better removing the redirect and turning it into a disambiguation page. (Emperor 17:59, 10 September 2007 (UTC))
  • Weak keep this does exist and was published in the Dark Horse Presents anthology (#56-64) [1] and is mentioned as one of his works on reliable sites [2] so it must be a solid contribution to his oeuvre. From what I can see it'd be worth leaving in for now - the big problem is that it needs a major clean up as it is an unencyclopedic style. The world might not end if this was deleted but I think it has potential to be a solid article about part of a notable artist's work for big comic publishing company. (Emperor 18:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC))
  • Keep incorporating Emperors links. Artw 22:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.