Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Commodore Comeback

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedied. --Phroziac _. o º ^{O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!)} 16:43, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Commodore Comeback

Speculation about a possible comeback of the Commodore 64, interspersed with something about sucking orange pies. — Gwalla | Talk 09:42, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete, about 75% nonsense and the rest unverifiable. Snurks ^{T C} 09:43, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• ::blinks:: Huh. I don't think it's really a speedy candidate, since it's not quite patent nonsense, but it's one of the weirder examples of non-patent nonsense I've ever seen. Definitely delete. – Seancdaug 09:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Amusing, nonetheless. Search4Lancer 10:10, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Lionel Ritchie BJAODN, methinks. Grutness...wha? 11:01, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, re-create if Commodore-related pie-sucking accepted as Olympic sport. --Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 11:07, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, some people just don't understand the concept of liquidation. Gazpacho 11:21, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Translate into English Oh no, it IS in English?! My word, Delete as it appears to be nonsense of a nevertheless amusing degree. doktorb | words 11:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research. May be a BJAODN candidate. Movementarian 13:02, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.