Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Colt (Supernatural)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus to delete, improvement needed in the form of citations. 1 != 2 22:46, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Colt (Supernatural)

The Colt (Supernatural) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Also including:

Singer Salvage Yard (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

No real-world context or claimed notability, fails WP:NOT#PLOT. These should be mentioned in Supernatural (TV series) if need be. Miremare 00:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete them both, no sources. AnteaterZot (talk) 02:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge to Supernatural tv series article. Twenty Years 03:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. I was going to agree with Twenty that it should be merged with Supernatural, but then I read through it, and there is far too much detailed information to merge these effectively at present. I strongly recommend that the author consider creating an "Artifacts from Supernatural" list page, as this is not only strongly needed, but would be much more robust in surviving AfDs than one for a single artifact weapon, no matter how important it is story-internally. Banazir (talk) 14:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
    • That's the point - there's far too much detailed information - it needs to be heavily cut down to be merged. Also, an article on artefacts from Supernatural would likely have exactly the same problems as this, i.e. lack of notability, no real-world context, and entirely made up of plot summary. Miremare 18:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep It should be kept until special section for Supernatural TV series will be created. Otherwise I do not think it would positive, especially when those articles are quite wide. Virgafatalis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.205.163.191 (talk) 15:46, 9 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.