Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Carpenter's Son

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g1 nonsense, expressly stated to be original research, Wikipedia is not every wacko's bulletin board for five days. NawlinWiki 17:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Carpenter's Son

The Carpenter's Son (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This appears to be original research, from what I can tell. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. This quote from the article says it all, really: "Wikipedia is the first and only to recieve this New found study of the Codes of the Bible". At least three of the five points of WP:NOT#OR apply here. ~Matticus ^T_C 14:22, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete completely original research, seems to be WP:MADEUP Deniz^T_C 14:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. It's not even amusing. Emeraude 14:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete blatant original research, and the fact that the initial letters of part of the King James Bible spells "NASA" backwards is hardly groundbreaking news. Hut 8.5 15:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.