Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Brink

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Black Kite 22:29, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Brink

The Brink (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This appears to be an advertisement for a minor program on a Hobart radio station. I can't see anything notable about it. Grahame (talk) 12:33, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete This article and a related entry on Ben Waterworth appear to have been conceived by the same author, appear to be self-promotion and are not notable. Murtoa (talk) 13:02, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep this article and the related article on Ben Waterworth as this is as relevant as any other page on a radio show, it is a show that serves the community and is relevant to the city of Hobart. The citizens of Hobart rely on it for information. In no way has the author written this as an 'advertisement', simply as a biography on the show and one of the hosts, which is completely relevant —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.217.6.9 (talk) 23:53, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment - this and most of the articles on contemporary shows at appear to be self referent with little or no reasonable third party sources - I would suggest a short close of this afd - and a review of all the arts - as to whether the others get off scott free sets a precendent where bias against one and there has not been a look at the others within the category - SatuSuro 05:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable show, cannot find online sources. --PeaceNT (talk) 12:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. A program on a college/community radio station cannot have sufficient notability without independent coverage from reliable sources. I see none here. Similarly, I see a lack of coverage of Ben Waterworth; so that article needs major improvement in a hurry before it also goes through AfD. B.Wind (talk) 15:38, 4 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.