Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bridal Gala™ (second nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bridal Gala™, which was still open when this AfD was started. Angr (talk • contribs) 14:00, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Bridal Gala™
Advertising. Was already up for an AfD once; discussion was a unanimous delete. Prodded again, but contested. Hbackman 07:07, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Note: Looks like the page creator may have removed the AfD tag before discussion was closed. I'll keep an eye out for that sort of thing this time around. Hbackman 07:11, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Note. Removing a AfD tag before discussion is closed does not devaluate or close the discussion. The first AfD is still open. When a AfD notice is removed (in cases of vandalism that is, not with the close of a discussion) the AfD discussion still remains on the Articles for deletion log page (for example), all that needs to be done is restore the AfD notice. There is no need to renominate the article for the second time, as there will be two open AfD discussions for the single article.--Blue520 12:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Oops, sorry. I thought that the other AfD had been closed for some reason... Is there a straightforward way to fix it? Should this discussion be merged into the first one? Hbackman 23:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Note. Removing a AfD tag before discussion is closed does not devaluate or close the discussion. The first AfD is still open. When a AfD notice is removed (in cases of vandalism that is, not with the close of a discussion) the AfD discussion still remains on the Articles for deletion log page (for example), all that needs to be done is restore the AfD notice. There is no need to renominate the article for the second time, as there will be two open AfD discussions for the single article.--Blue520 12:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Advertisment. --Icarus 09:48, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, advert. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 09:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, obvious advert. Lankiveil 11:36, 20 March 2006 (UTC).
- Delete, per nomination. Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:58, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- delete Spam Nigelthefish 16:57, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
