Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Three

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was REDIRECT to Big three. -Splash^talk 22:04, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Big Three

Neologism +/- original research. Ifnord 19:39, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - Not sufficiently notable. Endomion 19:41, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Big three, which contains about 20 big threes. Calsicol 19:57, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Big Three. The term is quite notable to the professional wrestling community and is quite commonly used. NickSentowski 21:44, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect per Calsicol. howcheng {chat} 22:10, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect Jamie ^{(talk/contribs)} 22:48, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect per others. Shawnc 01:52, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Motion Will be Redirected on Monday, DEC 26, 2005 unless objections are raised first.NickSentowski 21:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect - well know term should be merged into the redirect --- Paulley 15:56, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect as is used in other contexts Robdurbar 00:26, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect - the term is often used, though perhaps not often in this sense. Anyone looking for the term should end up at the disambiguation page, not here. --Badger151 09:36, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.