Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Four (football)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 05:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Big Four (football)

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/The Big Four (football)
The Big Four (football) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article doesn't cite any sources. Questionable factual basis and neutrality - for example, why a big 4 and not a big 3 or 5? why base any distinction on turnover - why not gate receipts? why not league/cup success? definition is too broad and infrequently used. Jw2034 22:55, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 16:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect to Central Pacific Railroad. Propaniac 16:39, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment Nomination referred incorrectly to The Big Four. --Dhartung | Talk 19:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
      • Well, it does make more sense now. Delete per everyone else, I guess. Propaniac 12:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Change to a disambiguation article with links to other "big fours." Realkyhick 17:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Arbitrary terms like these have passing use. If you take a ten-year time frame from anywhere else in the FA Cup Finals timeline, other dominant clubs emerge. Without any kind of sourcing, the only alternative is to delete. Caknuck 21:04, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This is far too arbitary - for instance, in this article, a 'Big Five' is referred to (in terms of turnover). ELIMINATORJR TALK 22:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sounds like an example of POV to me Rackabello 00:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete POV, lots of big # in most sports, varies by location. Carlossuarez46 04:17, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.