Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bible Experience

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 18:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Bible Experience

The Bible Experience (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Contested {{prod}} brought here for consensus. RobertG ♬ talk 11:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. In my view the subject doesn't meet any notability criteria, and article reads like an advert. --RobertG ♬ talk 11:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Agreed, not notable and reads like an advertisement. Xdenizen 11:19, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - It's an advert --Amists 11:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete advert. Robin Johnson (talk) 11:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and rewrite The stars in the thing make it notable. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 13:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Advert. WMMartin 14:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable advertisement. Hello32020 14:27, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, advertisement, Wikipedia is not your advertising company, approach Clear Channel, if you want to advertise. --Terence Ong _{(C | R)} 15:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Despite, barely, showing notability with newspaper mentions, this is clearly advertising. Perhaps someone may recreate it in a neutral way, but even then notabiliy is shaky. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 16:40, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This is a brand new product. We don't even know if it will have staying power over the years. Not every celebrity collaboration ends up having a lasting impact. This one might not. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. The news items don't carry this product over the threshhold of notability for me at all. Could be just a small "flash in the pan." And the article is an advertisment, which is a no-no. OfficeGirl 18:54, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.