Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bennett Invitational

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete all g1 nonsense/hoax, g10 attack, a1 empty (after unsourced material is removed). NawlinWiki 22:08, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Bennett Invitational

The Bennett Invitational (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article does not satisfy the notability guidelines as identified by another editor, has no sources, and has been like this for some time. In the absence of any real reason to keep it; I nominate that it be deleted.

The Rhymesmith 08:30, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Added the following articles to the AfD as players of the tournament; if the article on the tournament itself is deleted for lack of notability, then by extension these articles should be also:
  • Joe Slark
  • Dale Fastnedge
~Matticus TC 09:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all - an amateur competition with no indication of being documented in third-party sources, so failing WP:V and WP:RS. Tournament winner articles also fail WP:V and WP:BIO, with some unsourced controversial statements (allegations of cheating, etc.) providing WP:BLP violations to cap it off. Perhaps even speedy the bio articles as WP:CSD#A7. ~Matticus TC 09:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy all three The tourney in all likelihood doesn't exist ... searches on Yahoo and Google turned up exactly zero hits apart from Wikipedia and Wikipedia mirrors. Translation, a hoax. The winners' articles are clearly attack pages, and should be spiked per G10. Blueboy96 14:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete local golf tournaments are not notable Corpx 15:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete the tournament and the golfers as non-notable.
OK I tagged the latter two as attack pages. We'll see if others share the oppinion. 68.39.174.238 21:55, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.