Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The AnimeLand

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete: Circumventing a block is inherently a disruptive edit (vandalism, WP:CSD#G3), and the original editor was blocked by another administrator as a sockpuppet of a blocked user. —C.Fred (talk) 01:54, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The AnimeLand

The AnimeLand (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The article provides no reliable sources for ever expanding claims. For a show that has premiered yet, there's an astounding amount of trivia, even talking about its second season. It is just over-the-top enough that I suspect it may be a hoax, or at worst, original research. It also makes no claims about what network it will air on. Therefore, it is a television show that does not assert notability and cannot be verified. —C.Fred (talk) 23:52, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete as nonsense. I found nothing on Google to corroborate the article's claims, and Cartoon Network's website has absolutely nothing on it. Complete and utter balls. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 00:39, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
    • The problem is, the article is cohesive enough that it doesn't qualify as patent nonsense, so it's not eligible for speedy under G1. —C.Fred (talk) 01:33, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete and block creator; this article has been deleted once before and the creator is a sock of banned user Danny Daniel. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 00:48, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
    • I'm not seeing the pattern for the sockpuppet accusations, and the article is not eligible for speedy under G4, since it wasn't deletion by AfD. —C.Fred (talk) 01:33, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Then again, another admin blocked him as a sockpuppet, so the article is vandalism by definiton. —C.Fred (talk) 01:54, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.