Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Amazing Spider-Man: The Series
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-14 11:19Z
[edit] The Amazing Spider-Man: The Series
I think they meant Spider-Man (1994 TV series). Or else it's a joke. Their doesn't seem to a TV show of this name. If this show actually exists, close this AfD. Peregrine Fisher 09:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Needs more research... The numbers of episodes quoted don't match. I suspect you're right, and if so, move to merge and redirect.... but can someone check to make sure this is really what the author means? Alba 16:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. I'm going to make a judgement call that this is a hoax. I can find no evidence of a show running for this length ever being produced based upon Spider-Man, much less aired on Cartoon, and there is no IMDb listing for "Tyler Braddock". I would speedy it myself, however I don't want to supercede this AFD in case anyone can actually prove this is legit. 23skidoo 20:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I believe it's all made upGman124 20:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Would need like Alba said some extensive research, although if the Simpsons have articles for each episode,then I don't see why the Amazing Spider-Man would not even have an article (although I don't ask for article or resumes for each article). --JForget 22:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - hoax. A whopping zero Google hits for "tyler braddock" spider-man -wikipedia. Chris cheese whine 00:30, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete This is clearly a hoax, If there had been a show that lasted 134 episodes as written in the article then we should have been able to find something about it on tv.com, so I think it's just a hoax and we don't need to keep this article.UDHSS 22:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.