Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 7 elements of power.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Peacent 06:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The 7 elements of power.

The 7 elements of power. (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Weird article which appears to be original research about pseudophysics, although possibly about fiction. Borderline nonsense, prod removed by a username matching the real name of the creator. Delete. J Milburn 20:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

• Deleteas fiction or perhaps some sort of original research, in any event poorly written and unsourced, I highly doubt this is serious. DoomsDay349 20:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC) Upon checking the deletion log, Speedy Delete as repost. The deletion log reads "12:54, 19 March 2007 TexasAndroid (Talk | contribs) deleted "The 7 elements of power." (Blanked by creator)". Check the deletion log under "7 elements of power." for confirmation. <font color="darkblue">DoomsDay349 20:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

  Comment: That isn't how G4 works. Please re-read it. J Milburn 22:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

  Well we learn something every day, don't we?  :) Sorry on that one. DoomsDay349 22:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: The user is dyslexic, according to their userpage, so that accounts for the poor spelling. I think this is a serious article, but I doubt that there will be refs to bring this out of the original research arena, yet alone to make this idea notable. J Milburn 20:33, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

  I see what you mean. But I agree with the fact that there won't be enough ability to reference and to bring it out of OR, which is the important issue with the article. I didn't mean to insult anyone with the poorly written comment, it was just a statement of fact. DoomsDay349 20:40, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Nominator suggests this is borderline nonsense. I think it crossed the line. Emeraude 23:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as OR. Someguy1221 05:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.