Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheGunOwner

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 23:14, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] TheGunOwner

I'm not sure if there should be an article on the website operated by this person, but I'm pretty sure the site operator isn't notable (and this is probably vanity). --W(t) 02:45, 2005 May 19 (UTC)

  • Delete. Sholtar 02:46, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete appears to be vanity Terrace4 02:52, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:44, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
  • 'Delete. I doubt he created it for himself but it's not notable either way. I think I went to a party at this guy's house once a few years ago, though. Still not quite notable. --Fastfission 05:35, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 06:46, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to LivingWithStyle and merge basic identifying information only. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 17:14, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to LivingWithStyle and merge basic identifying information only. I agree. If you guys would actually take the time to reconniter this site you would realise it is noteworthy for its size and scope. I'm sad that you can't see that Mr. Chapman has created something no-one (to my knowledge) have managed to sustain - a very large, co-operative (usually) community. That in itself would prove that it is more then basic vanity that drives this article. Plus he himself didn't write it. Oh.. merge the articles if needed, but am sick of people putting down that which they haven't experienced --Rathgar 20 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. I tried to cleanup this article a little bit, and I am a member of these forums, which is a conflict of interest on my part. Sean 19:39, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.