Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thao Nguyen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thao Nguyen

Does not meet WP:BIO, delete --Peta 00:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per WP:BIO, non-notable person who's only claim to notability is being part of a non-notable organization. Few relevant Google results[1]--TBCTaLk?!? 01:03, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Stupid comment - Even I've got more hits than that one.Blnguyen | rant-line 04:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Alhtough, this article needs to be expanded, it has the foudation to be more than it currently seems. I would like to see what does indeed develop before we make the decision to delete it. Perhaps more of his accomplishments and contributions to Australia and the UN could be explained. I think the organizations inolved are notable, and therefore this article has the potential for becoming notable as well.--Blog Mav Rick 02:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. In running for young Australian of the year for NSW see [2] and there have been some mentions of her name in the media. Organised the first ethnic youth film festival and addressed the UN General Assembly so she has some achievements of note and perceived as a future leader. Capitalistroadster 03:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 03:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - The Youth UN is not a valid claim of notability, it is not a proper part of the UN with any weight or influence, it's just a mock debate competition so that high school kids can win a trip to Europe and do a mock debate. There were also 198 IDs on that archive that Capitalistroadster gave us and we certainly do not keep articles on players youth international sports teams or academic representative competitions like International Mathematics Olympiad etc. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Belikov Blnguyen | rant-line 03:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete' as per nom and Binguyen. No convincing indication of encyclopediac notability given by keep supporters. Not every candidate in every contest/election is notable guys. And claims of "future leader" potential is just crystalballing Bwithh 03:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, being in the youth UN is not a notable achievement. --Coredesat talk 04:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete oh yeah, this is just not a notable person, and our own Nguyen right here - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete major claim to fame is as part of the Australian delegation to the United Nations. Every person whose ever been in any country's or organization's delegation does not automatically merit an encyclopedia entry. If she becomes a future leader great, we'll talk then. --Nscheffey(T/C) 06:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as User:Blnguyen - Motor (talk) 10:17, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Blnguyen said it best. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 10:25, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per Blnguyen. SM247My Talk 11:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment this person is linked in the Australia section of The Weakest Link (and the link is at least several months old). If this is more than just a person with the same name, it'd suggest that someone else has a good faith opinion that the person is notable. Andjam 14:02, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment - there are around 200,000 people of Vietnamese etnicity in Australia, and about half have the surname Nguyen. Then half are female so 50,000. Thao would be easily on of the ten most popular female names, so there probably could be at least a thousand people with the same name. besides, being on Big Brother for everdday for 4 months isn't good enough, so an appearance in a30min TV show wouldn't do much either.Blnguyen | rant-line 03:30, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:VERWP:NOR at least that much should be in advance. Ste4k 16:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Per Blnguyen. Wickethewok 17:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Per Blnguyen. (Is there an echo in here?) Wikibout-Talk to me! 18:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and ensuing conversations here. -- Alias Flood 00:00, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete there is nothing inherently notable about his position and no notability asserted for himself as an individual. BlueValour 15:34, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.