Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Roadhouse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:19, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Texas Roadhouse

Blatant Advertising-Linkspam Avi 02:21, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete per nom. Avi 02:21, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

*Speedy delete per nom. –Ezeu 02:29, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Keep. It looked like a bad ad, so I voted a bit hastily. --Ezeu 02:50, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Cleanup, as I've already started to. It's definitely notable, if the assertions are true. Daniel Case 02:35, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
The old article was deleted; the current one is still under discussion here. Avi 02:37, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
My mistake; I typed in haste and have since edited my previous comments (before yours appeared). Website looks legit; however if I were an investor I'd not be impressed by the line that "We ... plan to open many new locations throughout 2005." Looks real sharp when it's late January and you forgot to update your website. Daniel Case 02:40, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep 200 locations makes it a rather large chain. Ruby 02:42, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Notable restaurant chain. Dbtfz 02:45, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep as cleaned up. National restaurant chain. (ESkog)(Talk) 03:08, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep -- Astrokey44|talk 03:22, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep always found it ironic that Texas Roadhouse began across the river from me in Indiana... so I just had to mention that in the article. --W.marsh 04:19, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep a restaurant chain with locations in 14 states is notable. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 05:12, Jan. 23, 2006
  • Keep, if it has over 200 restaurants, it's a notable chain, even if they all are in Merka. JIP | Talk 10:08, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep but make more interesting. Robin Johnson 11:11, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep seems legit. —This user has left wikipedia 12:22 2006-01-23
  • Keep Real chain, I've eaten there and all. Perodicticus 13:32, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per ruby. Mushintalk 14:12, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep real chain, needs to be cleaned up. Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 19:04, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is a major chain. The article needs lots of additions, though. BabuBhatt 22:51, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per BabuBhatt. -- Eddie 22:53, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep as a notable chain. Okay for a lower level steakhouse. Jtmichcock 00:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.