Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Testmagic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. dbenbenn | talk 14:43, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Testmagic
looks like spam. Nateji77 12:35, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Agreed. Delete unless it is actually an important company. Radiant! 13:14, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep cleanup and expand - 50,000 Google hits for educational software company. Megan1967 02:18, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep seems to have enough of a profile WpZurp 06:50, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, helpful, I cleaned it up. Wyss 12:10, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Google is deceptive on this one. A google search on "testmagic" but excluding returns from their own domain reduces the number of hits from 50,000 to 8,360. Scanning the first few pages of hits, most are advertisements that redirect to their domain, link pages or blogs. Digging deeper - According to this, it is a for-profit company generating revenues by advertising. Hoovers' reports that they generated a mere $430,000 revenues and have only 15 employees. That size does not rise to the level normally expected for inclusion of other companies. Since size did not establish notability, I started looking for other indicators. None of the reviews I found described their offerings as particularly innovative or influential. The Alexa ranking is ambiguous - huge variability over the past year. I can't find anything else. Unless other evidence can be found, reluctant delete. Rossami (talk) 23:10, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per Rossami; non-notable googlebombers. —Korath (Talk) 12:06, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per detective work. Cool Hand Luke 06:09, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. dbenbenn | talk 14:43, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.