Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TerrorWiki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Titoxd(?!? - help us) 07:41, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] TerrorWiki

NN wiki. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 02:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

It seems the nominator has not investigated any of these wikis, judging by later nominations, and I have not had time to do so. I agree with JJay that there may be more merit than an Alexa rating may provide. — The Hooded Man ♃♂ 03:19, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Like what? You just proved my point! Notability and WP:WEB are all that matter here. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 08:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep seems notable. -- JJay 03:15, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
    • How? Did you go there (and see the only page: "Sorry, the wiki's been vandalized by spammers. I'm going to see if I can fix it")? Did you apply WP:WEB? Blindly keeping everything? --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 08:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  • I'm quite surprised by your reaction. My comment was equal in length to your nom. As the nom, I fail to see why you withhold pertinent information regarding pages you nominate. Do you enjoy trying to make fools out of your voters? -- JJay 09:17, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not any more notable than your usual liberal websites. --Apostrophe 04:52, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - A site's use of MediaWiki is irrelevant in determining notability. FCYTravis 06:55, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Now a non-notable website like this being kept–that is terrifying. Okay, not really. Still should be deleted, though. Lord Bob 13:43, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Does not meet WP:WEB Agnte 13:47, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Notability is not Wikipedia policy just a guideline by which some but by no means all Wikipedians choose to operate. This website exists (admittedly only just, but it does) and is verifiable. Jcuk 21:41, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. nn. mikka (t) 23:43, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Existance and verifiability are not, by themselves, grounds for inclusion, especially in the case of webpages. -Sean Curtin 06:15, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete nn.  Grue  14:53, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. No real content on the site. I agree with JJay that including more info in nomination headers would be nice, though. -Colin Kimbrell 22:14, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.