Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete and redirect to terrorist terrorism (double redirect). Redirects are cheap. Deathphoenix ʕ 19:38, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Terrist

The overwhelming majority of g-hits are a misspelling (intentional or unintentional) of "terrorist". According to the talk page, in 2004, there was a consensus to delete (although the deletion log has nothing for this article unless I'm missing something). The article is half about an environmental neologism (terra + ist) and half about the misspelling of terrorism (how can a misspelling be notable?) It even includes a nice George W Bush joke for good measure. BigDT 17:11, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete the only source is an obscure wiki. --djrobgordon 17:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per the rather humorous nom. -- Kicking222 17:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Deleet it per nom. ---J.S (t|c) 18:00, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete POV. - Kookykman|(t)e
• Delete and redirect to terrorist so this can't happen again. Alba 00:30, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete POV. Retropunk 05:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and NPOV. Notable neologism. Sarge Baldy 01:02, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per Sarge Baldy: tidy up and add references. I've added a link [1] about the Fox/graffiti incident, and another link [2] showing an example of the use of the variant spelt "Terra1st". -- JimR 06:21, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.