Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrence Murphy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Keep as invalid nomination. Capitalistroadster 05:59, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Terrence Murphy

too vague —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hey 2006 (talk • contribs)

Comment: This AfD was created and edited by the above user and not listed at AfD; I've now listed it. No vote. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:50, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy keep. If the article has problems, clean it up. This is not what AfD is for. Chick Bowen 00:52, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep per Chick Bowen. Also, the article doesn't have the "too vague" problem. Kusma (討論) 00:54, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• EXTRA STRONG SPEEDY KEEP nominator of AfD is a vandal, nuff said. Moe ε 01:36, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep obviously Dlyons493 Talk 04:35, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep per Chick Bowen. --Terence Ong 04:43, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.