Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teresa Keane

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Some keep advocates did not substantiate why the person is notable, but simply noted that the Green result in Oregon was the best in the US. I guess a mention about the Greens having their best result in Oregon could go in the general senate election page.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Teresa Keane

Teresa Keane (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable, fails WP:BIO. Delete GreenJoe 15:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep. Asserted notability that she received highest percentage of green vote in that election is sufficient. -Pete 21:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Getting 2.4% of the vote for U.S. Senate is not notable; the fact that may have received the highest percentage of "green vote" is irrelevant; minor party nominees who fail miserably at the polls are not inherently notable. Carlossuarez46 22:12, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per Carlossuarez46. I just don't see this claim as anything notable. Generally third-party candidates in the US system do not attract significant media attention until they cross the 10% threshold. --Dhartung | Talk 08:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: Notability is not the same thing as electability. If a candidate is significant within a third party, and attracts media attention, that is something; an individual can be notable without having a major influence on a specific election. -Pete 10:03, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep notable politician. Deletion nom in a disturbing pattern of GP politicians by same user. T L Miles 16:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.