Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terence H. Winkless

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, though cleanup and sourcing would certainly be helpful. — TKD::Talk 01:58, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Terence H. Winkless

:Terence H. Winkless (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log) Delete poorly written hype that looks like an autobiography. Delete for insufficient notability. Wryspy 18:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn. See below. Wryspy 21:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Per above. •Malinaccier• ^T/C 19:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep He's got a pretty substantial filmography at his IMDb entry, and some Google news hits for his projects. However the article as it stands needs a massive rewrite, at best. (also, it's interesting the achievements the article chooses to focus on. Why not his career as a TV director?) Eliz81^{(talk)(contribs)} 19:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

After reading over the IMDB information, I have to agree that this person is notable, after all. The article, however, needs a massive rewrite in order to make that clear. Wryspy 21:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• Agree with notability -- keep the article -- but it needs a rewrite. (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.86.15.190 (talk • contribs)
• very very very very weak keep - Based on the awards on his IMDB page Corpx 04:31, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per above. Awful movies, truly bloody awful, but notable as is the writer. Bearian 18:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.