Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten O'Clock Classics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Singularity 00:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ten O'Clock Classics

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/Ten O'Clock Classics
Ten O'Clock Classics (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

There's not enough reliable source material that is independent of Ten O'Clock Classics for this article to meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you remove the information taken from the Ten O'Clock Music website, the article is down to two sentences. Fails Wikipedia:Notability. Jreferee (Talk) 05:34, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep -- Added another source -- TimeOUT NY.. With 2 articles in NY Times, a profile in Time Out NY, and an appearance on NPR's Soundcheck, I think this is clearly notable. Will added some of the other sources that I found shortly... User:newbiez12345
  • Keep - I see multiple sources to the New York Times, and a free newsmagazine in New York. I'd have to say this is notable. --Haemo 07:38, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Nice work adding more references. Seems definitely notable now Recurring dreams 09:09, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Met criteria for notability in advance of nomination, thanks to NYT and WNYC refs. Slightly tidied so that third party refs support TOC website comments. --DeLarge 10:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong keep, passes WP:RS easily. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 13:43, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep - if this group were from any city other than NYC, the "local" news coverage might not meet WP:N. --Evb-wiki 15:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • keep please there are many very good sources erasure would not make sense now yuckfoo 17:24, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.