Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tempered Zealot Productions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. east.718 at 17:55, November 29, 2007

[edit] Tempered Zealot Productions

Tempered Zealot Productions (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Is this really just a long advert ? thisisace 21:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Weak keep, seems to be at least somewhat notable given the number of films produced. This article could stand to be trimmed a great deal, however. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:39, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment the article is quite poor and cites no sources. It's only external links are to first party sites. That being said I think the potential must exist for the article to be improved given the number of short films produced, but then again maybe it's just not notable. Handschuh-talk to me 03:20, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tikiwont (talk) 09:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
  • weak keep: they've received an award, but that doesn't justify the amount of information here. Trim. --Paularblaster (talk) 00:29, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete-Overblown and promotional.---Iconoclast.Horizon (talk) 06:04, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete if not fixed. I'm not comfortable keeping this around on the presumption that they might be notable. It looks like this is a film company that has produced several obscure short films, one of which won an award that isn't even verified on the film festival website, as far as I could find. If someone rewrites the article from reliable sources by the end of this debate, I would change my mind. Mangojuicetalk 14:52, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.