Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tejo Mahalaya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete as copyvio and redirect. Chick Bowen 19:39, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tejo Mahalaya

plus redirects

Tagged for deletion by Nkv (talk • contribs), completing nomination Dr Zak 12:29, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, original research. The BBC page mentioned is not authored by the BBC, instead it's a bulletin board where people can write guidebook entries. Dr Zak 12:32, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the BBC page, Dr Zak says, is just part of a forum for the public (H2G2). This new article is just an attempt to bypass the monitoring of the Taj Mahal page. A page on Oak's book, with a link to the H2G2 page already exists (Taj Mahal: The True Story). Paul B 14:22, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy redirect to Taj Mahal: The True Story. -- RHaworth 18:07, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, a quick google search reveals a lot of URLs like this one, an exact copy of the article. This page is titled "Junk Funny EMails". -- ReyBrujo 18:14, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
  • The origin seems to be this Amazon review. Tagged for speedy delete as copyvio. Deleting and recreating this as a redirect per RHaworth sounds good. Dr Zak 18:23, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Furthermore, the page provides no worthwhile inputs that could be used in merging with the 'True story' article. ImpuMozhi 19:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy redirect per RHaworth and fixing this AfD template. TheProject 19:34, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.