Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teening

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 03:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Teening

Article has been tagged for merger for over a year and a half and tagged for cleanup since February. It's about a non-notable neologism that seems to have been made up for one essay, and the whole ~550 google hits are mostly a) specific mentions of that essay's title, b) wikipedia mirrors, or c) misspellings of "teeming". Prod semi-contested by new user Mcdreamy by adding essay ref, though not removing prod tag. The user had previously added a photo of herself/a friend that came from someone's blog. Opabinia regalis 06:09, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete obviously, since I prodded it in the first place. Opabinia regalis 06:10, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. A dictionary definition at best, not notable in and of itself. If it didn't read like an original theory article, I would be voting to merge with Adolescence anyway. Falcon 06:18, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nothing worth saving here that we don't have elsewhere. Jammo (SM247) 06:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete mere dicdef material at best Ydam 06:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. --Coredesat 07:36, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. Wretched neologism. Moreschi 10:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as neologism... and that's being a bit generous. Probably more likely a WP:NFT case. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as neologism.# --Xyrael ^T 17:22, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable neologism, OR and POV article. And... dipping snuff? --Allen 23:54, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 00:49, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 02:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Like, Delete it sir or madam. It's neologism. --Starionwolf 03:08, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I suppose. I tried to make it less "neologistic" and expand on it, but really there's not much I can do. Oh well. Goodbye to teening I suppose. We hardly knew thee. --Mcdreamy 16:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.