Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teddy Grahams

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 16:33, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Teddy Grahams

A consensus was reached at DRV to overturn the speedy deletion of this article [1]. This is a procedural nomination so I abstain. Thryduulf 15:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep, very well known product from an extremely well known company. --badlydrawnjeff talk 16:07, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Then you should easily be able to make a proper argument, citing sources, demonstrating that this product satisfies the WP:CORP criteria for products. Uncle G 17:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong keep per Jeff. NawlinWiki 17:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - per above - AfDs are getting ridiculous! PT (s-s-s-s) 20:12, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Dunne409 21:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep. Meets the requirements for product notability. Original speedy was nonsense.Cynical 22:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - apparant article log anomaly. The article log shows the deletion, but not the restoration. Carcharoth 00:25, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
    • This was recreated rather than undeleted following the speedy deletion. I have restored the page history, somebody may wish to merge information from the old version into the current one. Thryduulf 07:24, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep. Very well known product and the article clearly demonstrates the importance in the popular culture. I think the unreferenced tag should be removed as well. References don't need to be in a reference section to count. This is more a stylistic concern more than anything else. Irongargoyle 23:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.