Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Lilly 2007 Game Log

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Peacent 03:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ted Lilly 2007 Game Log

Ted Lilly 2007 Game Log (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The pages contain information that does not deserve its own page, especially since they only cover one specific year. Information about a players statistics can easily be obtained from websites like ESPN, Yahoo! Sports, or MLB.com. Additionally, the Wikipedia Baseball project believes (through a consensus two weeks ago) that 2007 Game Logs should even not belong in their respected player’s article, let alone merit their own page.

I am also nominating the following related pages for the aforementioned reasons:

Sean Marshall 2007 Game Log (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Carlos Zambrano 2007 Game Log (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Jason Marquis 2007 Game Log (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) -- ShadowJester07 02:05, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletions. -- -- pb30<talk> 02:14, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

I disagree - in baseball, it is very relevant to understand the individual games. The summary box does not highlight trends, and thus does not duplicate the information. It is already on a separate page, so does not impact the usability of the main page  Terren Peterson  ►Talk 

• Strong Delete All Fails WP:NOT#INFO (#9, Statistics). I don't see how saying how a player does in each individual game is encyclopedic. There are plenty of sites like ESPN or MLB.com that already have this info for those who would want it. TJ Spyke 02:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete all. Where do you draw the line? Which pitchers get logs? Are we going to have to have multiple articles for every pitcher? As Jester points out, there are already sites that do this sort of thing. Clarityfiend 02:40, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all pages nominated above per above. Groupthink 02:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete all, per TJ Spyke. (Nominated Sean Marshall for deletion before noticing this, sorry.) AllynJ 03:07, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete all Team season articles, yes. Individual season articles, no. Individual highlights can easily fit within either the team season article or the individual's article or both. Resolute 03:59, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Snowball delete all This is a bad, bad slippery slope. There are too many pitchers in MLB, present and past, for us to maintain a directory of statistics. Other websites are already doing that. YechielMan 14:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all per above.--Eva ^bd 14:49, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete absolutely useless - the stats in the player article are updated throughout the year. That's more then enough.--JForget 00:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.