Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technobangman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 15:57, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Technobangman

  ATTENTION!

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}

Probably nonsense, non-notable (0 Google hits), unverifiable, maybe an attack page. David Johnson [T|C] 17:50, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Also no relevant google hits on either listed "founder". Delete unless verifiable sources provided that clearly establish notability. DES (talk) 18:10, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per all above. PJM 18:21, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Hey. Thought id mention, being from the same areas mentioned in the Technobangman section and working in the film industry myself, i have heard whispers that two very well known forces in the British film industry are making a similair film (comedy). Apparently, the pair are fed up with the cinema critics giving them special attention, based on previous work in the industry. As a result of this frustration they may have used unknown names and an unknown production company to use during shooting. However, this could all be just a load of rubbish but i thought id mention it in case its useful. Will Hughes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.209.178.59 (talk • contribs) 13:01, 6 January 2006
  • Comment. Hello I am Liam Burbridge, one founder of technobangman. the reason i have not been searched for on google is because I'M NOT FAMOUS. we are a low budget film production company and are trying to start out with barely any funds. a place on wikipedia would mean we can be searched for on this site and google and would be a great help. i would be happy to add sources to make technobangman more authentic if you told me how. thanks (liamcb@aol.co —the preceding unsigned comment is by Liamcb (talk • contribs)
  • Comment. Hi there, i would like to mention that Technobangman does exist and that I, Sean Brophy are in fact a background artist on Pegface, the company has only recently started and is yet to establish itself, if you were to give it a chance and not doubt its credibility then you will see that in a few years it Mr Burbridge and Mr Hullait will be hitting the Hollywood scene. Thankyou —the preceding unsigned comment is by 83.216.91.74 (talk • contribs)
    • comment then in a few years we would be glad to have an artilce about them or this project. Wikipedia does not generally have articles about things that are not in some way already notable or of encyclopedic value. Things or people that might be notable someday are nor normally included. "I'M NOT FAMOUS", "trying to start out", and "yet to establish itself" all pretty clearly indicate that thsi does not belong in wikipedia. If Technobangman has recieved significant coverage in major media, please indicate this in the article, providing dates and story titles/headlines, and links if the content is online. Otherwise this looks like a probable delete to me. My previous vote is only strenghtened by these comments. DES (talk) 22:10, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete not encyclopedic (yet?) CDC (talk) 19:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Comment Thanks. Obina 01:49, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Antagonistic comments

  • "comment" you people are odd. what sort of hoax would this be? we just chose a name that Joe invented that we thought was funny. and in what way is it nasty? i dont see any evidence toward this being sockpuppets either. stop being so paranoid, we aren't hurting anyone. liam. —the preceding unsigned comment is by Liamcb (talk • contribs)
  • why are you accusing us of this skullduggery etc? what was on another website? we are not trying to alter anything. it is tragic that people would waste time with this. if you delete us technobangman will come down upon you with great vengeance and furious anger. thank you. liam.
  • a movie poster will be on the page soon. word up. shout out to all the technobangmans, this poster is gonna BANG in your FACE. ble$$ 1. 1 peace 1 love 1 pride. one earth. don't pollute it. get me. love you. don't delete, increase the peace —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.110.149.183 (talk • contribs) .
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.