Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technisoft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 11:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Technisoft, Report Manager, and Service Manager

Technisoft (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Service Manager (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Report Manager (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non-notable company and products. "Technisoft" gets only self-generated g-hits and "Technisoft Report Manager" receives only hits on this company's website. Please see WP:CORP and WP:SOFT for Wikipedia's guidelines for corporation and software notability. --BigDT 04:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete them all per nom. They also sound a little adish.--M8v2 04:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all Three unique GHits for a piece of software is almost willfully obscure. - Richfife 05:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per above. MER-C 06:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all mmm. Tastes like spam. --Jayron32 06:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Sharkface217 05:10, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - at least one is a copyvio (see google's cache version; site is currently down: [1]) others are spam anyway. -Patstuart^talk|edits 13:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom. NeoJustin 22:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The software listed is obscure at best, and the fact it only gets 3 ghits is testament to its obscurity. The pages also appear to read more like a spiel or advertisement. There is no reason, at this time, to keep them. --SunStar Net^talk 00:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• Guidance please. Will agree to remove Report Manager, though would like to list it as a product under Technisoft. Service Manager is one of the most widely respected service management software products in use worldwide. A Google search of "technisoft service manager" will return 1100+ hits. At what point does a company or company product become notable enough to allow it to have a Wikipedia entry? Microsoft Dynamics GP is a competing product that does have a Wikipedia entry ... Accpac and The Sage Group distribute Service Manager and Report Manager worldwide. Refer http://www.sage.com/news.php?id=196 for a feature article on Service Manager. Fkrugerx 03:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• To further support my case. Service Manager certainly comforms to Notability test "The software is among the core products of a notable software developer or vendor." Refer http://sage.com "Sage is a leading supplier of business management software and services to 5.2 million customers worldwide." Technisoft is a development partner of The Sage Group and Service Manager is the company's flagship product. Fkrugerx 03:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• rm -rf * / delete - per nom --61.114.193.19 12:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• KEEP need to be cleaned up - BUT, overall I found it to be good article, thank you for your time. Rcehoppe 08:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no evidence of meeting WP:CORP/WP:SOFTWARE. "Good article" is not a criterion for inclusion. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete All as insufficiently notable per WP:CORP#Criteria for products and services and, as proposed, WP:SOFTWARE. -- Satori Son 06:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.