Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tech Dictionary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - Yomangani^talk 00:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tech Dictionary

Advertisement/promotional; fails WP:WEB; most of creator's contributions have been external links (mostly to this site); author's changes (in response to prod tag) did not convince me that subject meets WP:WEB (being mentioned on a couple of small websites does not establish notability). OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WEB and ADVERT. QuiteUnusual 18:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep because a site is not owned by a conglomerate like Webopedia (which is included) should not determine value and if you decide value based on creator contributions Wikipedia becomes elitist. If this site should be deleted so should Webopedia. On the point of only being mentioned on small websites is elitist but when I checked some the small websites that consider it useful enough to mention and link are the US Army, grade schools, high schools, and universities (search google link:sitename). I see this addition as valuable to Wikipedia. But what do I know I'm just a Wikipedia user not a big time contributor. Kkrimmer 19:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Note This is the above editor's only contribution. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:48, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep because I think it's useful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.31.62.201 (talk • contribs)

Note that anon IP is sockpuppet of this article's creator; see Webopedia afd. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:56, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:WEB, no sources provided to attest to its notability. Also, it borders on {{db-spam}}, and the "keep" votes above are singularly unconvincing. Sandstein 09:32, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete tried it to lookup "TTL" - definition was bad. bye. Widefox 02:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.