Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teagames

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 16:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Teagames and Teacon

Appears to be advertising. Blnguyen 02:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Its not advertising, I just like the site and want to give people information about it and Teacon. —the preceding unsigned comment is by Dmnkn1ght (talk • contribs) 02:58, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

  • This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. Crypticbot 17:44, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  • I've added Teacon to this afd, per the above. Leaning delete. Article doesn't assert anything that would let it pass our notability guidelines. —Cryptic (talk) 17:50, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete reads like an advertisement ("Massive" in one article; "Incrediably popular" in the other), no discusuion, no indication of notability beyond peacock terms. DES (talk) 18:00, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

I recently updated the Teagames page, explaining the controvercial nature of the site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.199.37.10 (talk • contribs)

  • Delete especially Teacon, which seems to be an outright fabrication. —David Wahler (talk) 19:01, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Teacon non notable event. Neutral for Teagames not sure how to do that Alexa thing to see if this is a notable.Obina 21:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
    • you get it from here: [1] and based on that rank of 2736, Id say Keep Teagames, and merge teacon into it since that it just a convention for Teagames -- Astrokey44|talk 03:43, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Astrokey44 you are a smart man, <3 68.127.102.226 07:24, 14 January 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.