Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teagames (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was del mikka (t) 01:22, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Teagames (re-nom)

Previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teagames, but undeleted for further review at DRV. No vote from me. -R. fiend 22:03, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

• Weak delete it has an okay Alexa rank, but the article as it stands is extremely insubstantial and reveals some of the inherent problems with covering most websites: without getting into trivia, there often just isn't a whole lot to say about them. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:30, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Fails WP:WEB. Simply not encyclopedic. - brenneman^(t)(c) 23:48, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable enough. JDoorjam 23:50, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per brenneman. Ruby 01:18, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep - needs more content, as it doesn't even cover the latest additions - Ace of Risk 18:47, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Brenneman is right. Eusebeus 07:48, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per Brenneman. Thryduulf 15:58, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete previously deleted. incog 00:56, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I supposed I'm not allowed to say "speedy as previously deleted material." But I'd like to :P RasputinAXP _{talk contribs} 23:51, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Thirty Flash games. RII-IIGHT! Pilatus 17:13, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.