Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Garron
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus, default to Keep. Walton Need some help? 19:09, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Taylor Garron
Non-notable child actor with no significant roles, the most notable being a contestant on FETCH! with Ruff Ruffman. The only reliable source which seems to cite her existence in more than passing is TV.com, where her mention is still very brief. Fails WP:BIO without a doubt.-- Cielomobile talk / contribs 03:34, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per no significant contribution to her field. the_undertow talk 06:13, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per meeting this WP:BIO entertainer notability criterion: "With significant roles in notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions." Full season roles in two different nationally broadcast PBS Kids series (ZOOM and FETCH! with Ruff Ruffman) does qualify as "significant roles", contrary to nom assertion. Many American little kids are familiar with such TV child actors, even if many Wikipedia contributors are not. This bio page is referenced by both series' Wikipedia pages, and I believe the project is better served by keeping this one for the additional info & references it provides. --SaguarosRule 19:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Question - I am open to reason, so I am wondering, is your assertion that the longevity is what makes it a significant role? We need to establish that Zoom is notable, as well as her part. the_undertow talk 22:04, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Her part is not notable, though. She was a contestant for one season of FETCH, according to her TV.com bio, which does not even include her ZOOM role, suggesting that it was even less notable. We do not give articles to actors with a relatively minor role in two somewhat obscure series. If she assumes more notable roles in the future, she can be added, but right now, she definitely fails WP:BIO. -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 04:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Question - I am open to reason, so I am wondering, is your assertion that the longevity is what makes it a significant role? We need to establish that Zoom is notable, as well as her part. the_undertow talk 22:04, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- No vote --Infrangible 18:31, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Convinced by SaguarosRule.--Holdenhurst 11:55, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
