Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tattoology

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete all three articles. Joyous 03:05, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Tattoology, tattoologist, and Joshua Andrews

Tattoology was coined in the year 2000 by Tattoologist Joshua Andrews, to aid the development of this newly emerging, multi-disciplinary inquiry into every facet of the world of tattooing. Neoligism -and- vanity -and- original research--nixie 11:36, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. If the first two neologisms showed evidence of significant use I'd say redirect them to tattoo, but as a google for "Joshua Andrews" Tattoology gets just 21 hits, I suspect we're safe in deleting the lot. -- Infrogmation 15:45, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete — agreed, at least until drawology, paintology and sculptology come into widespread use. :) — RJH 19:40, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Welcome to the newly emerging, multi-disciplinary inquiry of Deleteology. --[[User:BD2412/deletion debates|BD2412] 23:05, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete them all. Vanity neologisms, ads. Wyss 00:58, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• It will take more than an umlaut symbol to save this neologism. Delete all three. Fire Star 00:20, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I concur with RJH, assuming, of course, this whole thing wasn't a hoax. In that event, delete with extreme prejudice. Edeans 20:04, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.