Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tattoology (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Did not even need AfD - could have been speedied as a repost. -- RHaworth 08:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Tattoology
Incomplete nomination by User:Dumarest. Looks like a neologism and/or dicdef. --- RockMFR 23:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Previous discussion (result was delete): Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tattoology
- Delete per the earlier AFD as neologistic dicdef. Don't see that anything's changed. Fan-1967 00:17, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Neologism, dicdef. Mr Stephen 00:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per previous AFD. Danny Lilithborne 01:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per earlier AFD SkierRMH,02:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete CSD:G4. I tagged it such. Mishatx 07:17, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and Redirect to Tattoo. TerriersFan 08:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
