Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Targo and Abbdona

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted as obvious vanity/hoax entry. Apart from the creator all voters agreed it didn't belong in the article namespace. Creator has copy on their own website. Userfication not needed. - Mgm|(talk) 12:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Targo and Abbdona

Delete as NN micronation/vanity page. Original article was {{prod}}ed and contested by creator. Article currently claims to have declared independence from the UK as of yesterday (25 June 2006). Article was created by the micronation's 17 year-old king (King Finn I --> Prof. Finn). --Bugwit grunt / scribbles 17:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Let's see "The national flower is a yellow thing (we don't know what it is yet) which grows among the reeds. The flag (above right) was designed by the king, as was the coat of arms, both in photoshop." Yup pure vanity. Wildthing61476 17:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per vanity and no assertion of noatbility. Fails WP:V as well Ydam 17:17, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as joke/hoax. It's clearly non-notable in any case. --Ed (Edgar181) 17:24, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Cute and amusing, but not an encyclopedia article. --William Pietri 18:10, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Userfy. It's a pity to let this go, but I agree it can't stay in the main namespace. Tevildo 20:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Per Tevildo, and for what its worth, I have no objection to userfying the article, despite the vandalism of my user page by "His Majesty". --Bugwit Speak / Spoken 01:21, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
User already has own copy on his website. - Mgm|(talk) 12:42, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I HAVE DONE NOTHING WRONG

I am the only person who knows enough to write any more than a sentance about Targo and Abbdona. Do you think H. M. Queen Elizabeth II is in denile about the fact that she is a Queen? NO! I have to refer to my self as the King! You don'y go round deleting the Kingdom Of Lovely artical do you? NO! I actualy am the King of at least 10 time the land on King Danny!!!

Accept this artical because it is NOT A HOAX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Prof. Finn (talk • contribs) .

  • Comment Actually, you have done something wrong. You have vandalized my user page, apparently in retaliation for the nomination of this article for deletion ([1], [2]), and you have started making what could be seen as bad-faith deletion proposals ([3]). In other words, you aren't doing anything to help yourself out, you're just stirring up trouble. --Bugwit Speak / Spoken 12:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment- That you are the only person who could write more than a sentence about the topic is a sign that it's not an appropriate article for Wikipedia. See WP:VANITY and WP:AUTO for more info on why you should let other people write about yourself and your projects. --William Pietri 21:13, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete; micronation silliness. Kingdom Of Lovely had a TV show based around it. You haven't. (Quite honestly, though, the KoL article could use some serious work.) Zetawoof(ζ) 08:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, now I'm convinced it's a hoax. --Coredesat talk 08:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Loony. -- GWO

Any one who says this is just compensating for the fact that they are not real them selves Oh, and I'm sory Bugwit —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.109.189.94 (talk • contribs) .

  • Delete or Userfy. Per WP:HOAX. Cadidate for BJAODN? --DarkAudit 16:52, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete avec un ax, please. Subzero notability. WilyD 16:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete-- I don't think this is even suitable for Uncyclopedia IMFromKathlene 18:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and throw into a small swamp in Dorset. NawlinWiki 21:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, a made up fantasy of a micronation. Did the author really send a declaration of independence?? =0 Grandmasterka 08:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as hoax. Fake "nation" not recognised by any other nation (and in all reasonable likelihood not recognised by anyone besides its supposed "king"). Please do not userfy this patently-unverifiable material. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 10:35, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment Prof. Finn just added to the article a threat to "sentence to death" anyone who edits it. This is no longer funny. NawlinWiki 12:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I sent a declaration of independance to No 10! Why would I go to all the trouble to set up 2 websites about my REAL COUNTRY and a wikipedia entry???

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Prof. Finn (talk • contribs) NawlinWiki 12:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. Countries are only real after they've been recognized. And if they're not only major press attention could warrant an article about them. Since yours was only recently formed it fulfills neither of the criteria. - Mgm|(talk) 12:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.