Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TarProxy

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. dbenbenn | talk 06:52, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] TarProxy

Non-notable anti-spam idea that hasn't been implemented and hasn't gone anywhere. Doesn't merit an independent article. --BM 12:46, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect with Tarpit (computing) and Teergrube. Contrary to the above paragraph, the technique is established and used in the field. I believe that teergrube is the most common term, even in the English language. Pilatus 12:53, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - this is a brand name for a non-existent tarpit. -- Cyrius|✎ 19:43, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Concur with Cyrius, Delete (although a redirect is appropriate, there is nothing interesting in this article to merge) Radiant! 15:01, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Concur with Radiant! --Neigel von Teighen 15:09, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Merge Might be useful in the future, if the tecnology is readily available to the public. Bratsche 16:41, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, advertisement for vaporware. Do not merge. —Korath (Talk) 17:54, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.