Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tantric Massage Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-28 14:52Z

[edit] Tantric Massage Association

Tantric Massage Association (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Related nomination to Tantra massage. Only sources don't look to be overly reliable, and this tends to make me feel the notability of this association is shaky.-- Syrthiss 22:24, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tantra massage closed as Delete for lack of independent sources. ~ trialsanderrors 08:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• delete though I voted keep for Tantra massage, for this I'll have to vote delete instead. Only 53 ghits, and in a lack of any further evidence (the article sure doesn't provide any) I'd have to support it's deletion. Mathmo ^Talk 16:36, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Majorly (Talk) 13:57, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete not notable enough to have sources. WP:V requires multiple non-trivial publications. James086^{Talk | Contribs} 14:24, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. There seems to be no page Tantra massage or Tantric massage to say what it is. Anthony Appleyard 17:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as insufficiently notable. No non-trivial coverage by reliable, third-party sources. -- Satori Son 05:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.