Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tania Russof

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep (No consensus) No clearcut delete rationale but not many keepers so... NC. --++Lar: t/c 04:02, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tania Russof

Subject does not seem notable, e.g. doesn't appear to meet guidelines in proposed Wikipedia:Notability (pornographic actors). I would have tagged it for speedy deletion under CSD A7, but it has been edited by several different people since it was created so it seems better to list it here. Jll 19:58, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Seems notable enough for mine. Private films are high profile in Europe and she has had her name in the title in one of them. She seems notable enough in the pornographic film industry to warrant an article. Capitalistroadster 22:58, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

The company is certainly notable, but they have a large output, currently ten films a month[1]. Jll 23:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Even under the (still unofficial) notability guidelines, she passes the bar. 23skidoo 02:58, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

I cannot see that she has met any of the criteria suggested in the proposed guidelines. Which one have you identified? Jll 09:49, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.