Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tane No Uta
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was MERGE to Strawberry Flower. Much is already there; I've merged the other stuff, but it seems a little crufty. -Splash - tk 22:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Tane No Uta
No sources, no nothing. violates WP:Crystal Momusufan (talk) 05:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment You might want to check out Pikmin Dance too. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 05:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep/find an appropriate merge target Japanese entertainment magazine sources like Famitsu [1] and Dengeki [2] at least confirm it's the Pikmin 2 theme song. Dunno if the article could be anything more than a permastub, though. I'm not too sure where the complaint of WP:CRYSTAL is coming from, given that it describes a past event. cab (talk) 09:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 09:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Merge to Strawberry Flower unless sources (such as charting) are found to show song is notable. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep and speedy close. Charted at #28 [3]. Neier (talk) 15:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ——Torc. (Talk.) 06:47, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - How does this violate WP:CRYSTAL? Also, Merge to Strawberry Flower. Notability is met, but there's still not enough information to warrant an article separate from the album. Per WP:MUSIC: "A separate article is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; permanent stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." The information (and a redirect) should be kept, but there's no cause to have this as a separate article. —Torc. (Talk.) 03:03, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
