Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TameStorm Games

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. —Kirill Lokshin 02:19, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] TameStorm Games

Page exists just to promote this game company and contains no other useful infomation. It is also very very short. Duplicate can also be found at Tamestorm but I have tagged that for speedy. Reason for sending to vote is because they do seem to have made a couple of games so I am unsure if it meets the notably requirement or not. Grandwazir 13:55, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. Alexa rating of 712,342.--Esprit15d 14:19, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment My speedy at it's duplicate Tamestorm has been removed, would it be possible to have this vote decide both of them, considering they are identical in every way except for the title. Grandwazir 14:51, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Duplicate articles are redirected, not speedied. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 06:10, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete fails to meet WP:CORP criteria. --Terence Ong 15:42, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --NaconKantari 21:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not a notable game company. --Wrathchild (talk) 20:02, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment/Note to closing admin: I changed Tamestorm to be a redirect to TameStorm Games. If this article is deleted so should the redirect. --Wrathchild (talk) 15:39, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
    • I think (hope) we can trust whoever closes the discussion to check "what links here" and delete any orphaned redirects. From time-to-time Wikipedia has been able to attract relatively cluey admins, strange though it sounds ...
      • Yeah, I know. I was on a strange "cover all bases" kick yesterday. I did not mean to imply that an Admins were less than clueful. Mea culpa. --Wrathchild (talk) 13:14, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 06:10, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.