Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamas Menyhart

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - consensus favors deletion due to lack of proven notability

[edit] Tamas Menyhart

Tamas Menyhart (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

non-notable supporting actor, unreferenced, prod removed TubularWorld (talk) 17:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment. Previously deleted per CSD A7. (deletion log) Kakofonous (talk) 18:20, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to IMDB, he only had very minor roles in somewhat noble films. [1] --Amlebede (talk) 21:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Come on now. Can someone have a fair chance to have a Wikipedia page? Yes, his IMDb credits are low and their updates takes a long time! If you take a look at his resume on his MySpace, he's had more credits than on IMDb. He had just signed to a big management and this will take off his career. Give a guy a chance for him to grow more notable. He is working his rear off to be more out there. MeanChe (talk) 22:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Comment - He is currently not very notable. As of today, he only has 270 Google Hits. [2] When he actually becomes notable, he will have a wikipedia page. Myspace is not a reliable source. --Amlebede (talk) 23:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
  • So, when he has a decent resume on ill-updated IMDb and has the notablity like Tom Cruise, he gets to have a stable Wikipedia page? MeanChe (talk) 01:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable. It's telling that when you filter out the words "youtube" and "myspace" the google hits are less than 100, some of which are Wikipedia and directory-style entries.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  • In the end, Tamas's article is going to be deleted anyways. Go ahead and get it over with. I find it no point to continue on with this. MeanChe (talk) 17:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.