Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamana Civilization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:19, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tamana Civilization

Appears to be original research, sourced only to one Geocities site on this one scientist's work. NawlinWiki 15:09, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

• I've looked, and can find no evidence that anyone else, beyond its initial proponent, has acknowledged the idea of the civilisation described. This is original research, a novel hypothesis that has not been acknowledged by the rest of the world and become a part of the corpus of human knowledge. There's no evidence that it has been peer reviewed or even independently fact checked. Delete. Uncle G 17:20, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. "Vomos-Toth Bator" gets precisely one Google hit: the Geocities webpage cited by this article. That is... less than stellar evidence of notability, even if we wouldn't need to delete it anyway as WP:OR. Sandstein 19:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

PS: "Vamos-Toth Bator" gets some 200 hits, but the above still applies. Sandstein 19:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete WP:NOR is a core policy. GRBerry 03:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This is stuff for Uncyclopedia. Pavel Vozenilek 16:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Pseudoscientific neomythology. — Aetheling 05:41, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.