Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tallest buildings in Tokyo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Result was Keep and rename to List of tallest buildings in Tokyo. — Caknuck 01:20, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tallest buildings in Tokyo

Tallest buildings in Tokyo (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate source of information. The Tallest Buildings in Tokyo is definitively not encyclopedic. What next, the tallest buildings in Harrisonburg, VA? WP:NOT#DIR - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 03:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, rename to List of tallest buildings in Tokyo. I refer the nominator to Category:Lists of tallest buildings. This is a discriminate and encyclopedic list (although it should be sourced as well). --Dhartung | Talk 05:01, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, as per other keep, as so long as it is made to meet Wikipedia:List_guideline. --Remi 05:29, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point ... I suspect that this is a bad-faith nomination in response to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 56 ZIP codes, as demonstrated by SVRTVDude's comment on that page, which was made ten minutes prior to this AfD ... coupled with the fact that there is no AfD notice on the article under discussion. —68.239.79.97 (talk · contribs) 06:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep but Rename per Dhartung. This is encyclopedic information. --Charlene 09:54, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - the sorted list supplies info in a way that the category cannot. Also, rename per above, and categorize into the Category:Lists of tallest buildings in Asia subcat. Neier 11:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep- agree with rename suggestion- no reason to delete though as this is useful and sourcable information Thunderwing 19:48, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Neier 11:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
• Lists like these can also serve as useful merge targets. Punkmorten 20:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep useful list, consistent with WP norms. Carlossuarez46 21:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - This appears to be a unnecessary fork from List of tallest buildings and structures in Japan ... aside from the "under construction" section, it's just a duplication of information ... aside from that, I agree with Rename to match the others in Category:Lists of tallest buildings in Asia. --72.75.73.158 23:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Useful article that would benefit from explicit sources. Alansohn 18:07, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
• So this is what he was gassing on about. Keep. Rename to "List of tallest buildings in Tokyo, provide sources, add the proper category, and include US measurements fergawdsake. Ordered list, with strictly objective, useful, and commonly used criteria for inclusion. What's not to like? --Calton | Talk 14:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.