Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talia Rubel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus.

[edit] Talia Rubel

Previous PROD'd by Calton as "Non-notable actress -- Off-off-Broadway and one shot-on-video no-budget picture" - Concur with that assessment. Delete MikeWazowski 03:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:BIO, only 904 Google results [1]. --TBCTaLk?!? 04:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  04:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:BIO. --Coredesat talk 08:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn. Haikupoet 04:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I have no idea why this is deemed non-notable. The google search means nothing - only a cultural preponderance towards certain topics, or topics of interest to the computer literate etc. Given that this encyclopedia has endless articles on fictional characters from American TV and sci-fi - it seems ridiculous that an article about an actress who has starred in a multi-award winning movie should be deleted. Talia Rubel is included in all the main movie list sites including the New York Times.--Zleitzen 17:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Week Keep Starring in a notable film conveys presumptive notability (though I's like to see some references). If Red Cockroaches is notable (and it looks like it probably is) then she is also, IMO. Eluchil404 18:00, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.