Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tali Hatuel

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sasquatch′↔T↔C 03:54, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Tali Hatuel

While this represents a personal tragedy for all those in her family I dont see why she is particularly notable, now why this event / person merits its own separate page. This is an Encyclopedia - not the home for a tribute page for every victim of violence the world over - no matter how sad. 62.253.64.14 22:16, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

What bothers me more than anything is why an anonymous user's set-up for a vote should be taken seriously at all. Who the heck are you bud and why are you afraid to register for a regular Wikipedia ID??? IZAK 05:13, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Because I saw what happened to Yuber and how he was harassed off the board? Create a climate of fear and you get users too afraid to log in. Shrug. 62.253.64.15 07:10, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Aw Shuks, lemme give you a pacifier too! Listen bud, Yuber broke all the rules around here, he wasn't some "innocent" babe in the woods, but maybe you are, so why don't you come out of hiding darling...? IZAK 08:19, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

IZAK - if you can put aside the sarcasm for a minute and look at the behaviour of your fellow travellers on wikipedia:

From the Tali Hatuel History page - after I proposed this VfD

# (cur) (last) 02:03, 19 July 2005 Guy Montag m (fuck off)

# (cur) (last) 22:14, 18 July 2005 62.253.64.14

So what do you want me to do fuck off or get a login? Dont tell me ... "get a login and then fuck off"?

I'm open to offers. 62.253.64.14 17:22, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

By your actions, you have already proven yourself to be a worthless editor. Don't register, don't even read wikipedia. I don't need another Yuber around here.

Guy Montag 18:05, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. While researching this tragedy on the Web I was led to the Wikipedia page and found it very useful. An encyclopedia article that contributes to research (I'm a Ph.D. criminologist) is worthwhile, indeed.
• Keep. While most of the thousands of deaths in this conflict are not notable, this one in particular is. The gruesome cold-bloodedness of the deliberate killing of a pregnant woman and her 4 young daughters caught the world's attention; it made all the news stories, and is still referred to years later, getting 5750 Google hits. It had a huge impact on the Israeli populace, and was significant enought that Amnesty International referred to it specifically as a "crime against humanity". Jayjg ^(talk) 23:14, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, notable for the media attention it attracted jamesgibbon 23:40, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I think the links at the bottom of the article are sufficient citations to show the subject is notable. — Asbestos | Talk 23:43, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This is clearly notable. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 00:39, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, agree with Jayjg. BTW, votes by anons are not counted, so why are we allowing to nominate an article for VFD to someone who didn't even bother to register? ←Humus sapiens←Talk 02:49, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep for all the above reasons cited by those above. IZAK 05:13, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. – Smyth\^talk 09:57, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
• KEEP This is both notable and the fact that an anon has initiated this ridiculous vfd to prove a point makes this disgusting. Guy Montag 18:02, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

And exactly what point would that be? How about a litle judicious application of the wikipedia guideline assume good faith? 62.253.64.14 18:06, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Your point is that you are a vicious anti Israel pov pusher who is angry that there is an article about someone your precious Palestinians murdered.

Guy Montag 19:08, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

I think all human life is precious. Palestinian or not. Don't you? 62.253.64.14 19:22, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. It's time for Guy Montag to be censured. Grace Note 05:36, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. While all the deaths are important to remember this one in particular is simply so gruesome, so brutal and so unimaginable. Even more surprising about this horrific crime is how it was so under reported. All the more reason to keep. (User:Cosmo919, on his first edit ever, forgot to sign)

• Obvious keep - Alas, Guy Montag seems to have gone insane, This was never going to get removed. --Irishpunktom\^talk 15:03, July 22, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.