Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take a Bow (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect all to their respective albums. Singularity 07:06, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Take a Bow (song)

Take a Bow (song) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Nothing notable about this song. Not released as a single, nothing special happened because of it. Article is empty but for infobox (I would go with {{db-empty}}, but I'm giving the article creator a chance to add content). Image used is actually the album cover (since there is no "song cover"). Giggy ^Talk 03:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

(Giggy, your opinion on the music is utterly of no use here. Please stop providing it.)

I am also nominating the following related pages, which are in the same situation, created by the same person:

Overdue (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Fillip (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Exo Politics (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Assassin (Muse song) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Soldier's Poem (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Fury (Muse song) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Ruled by Secrecy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Dark Shines (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Futurism (song) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Screenager (song) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

• Delete all as not meeting the requirements at WP:MUSIC by a wide margin. They don't even play 80% of these songs live - how in the world can anyone consider them notable? (I do, however, disagree with the nominator on the quality of "Take a Bow"......) fuzzy510 04:03, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

  Some of the other songs on Black Holes are so much better. Like Exo Politics (nommed here, but it's bloody good). Anyway, we aren't here to discuss my correct taste in music :P Giggy ^Talk 04:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

  Delete all - I concur with Fuzzy. None of these meet the specific song-page requirements in WP:MUSIC, and there's no evidence to suggest they can or will anytime soon. Personal taste is no factor at all. Bullzeye ^{(Complaint Dept./Brilliant Acts)} 15:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete all. The question to ask is: has notability been established enough for a fully fleshed out article to be written about these songs, from independent secondary sources, individually? answer: no. Zunaid©® 15:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to the album article(s). This doesn't require an AfD, just be bold. Corvus cornix 18:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

  If there were one or two, I would. With this many, I decided to go this way just to be safe. Giggy ^Talk 23:15, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect If there was anything in the article, it could be moved back to the album article - as it is, a sinple redirect would suffice.Nigel Ish 21:04, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect them to their respective albums (not singles, not-notable). — mæstrosync ^{talk&contribs}, 00:32, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect - They should all simply redirect to the respective album, regardless of whether or not information on the specific song is there. At least someone who is searching the topic will find a relevant subject. NSR77 ^T_C 18:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all - I don't think anything here really cries out for a full article. Salvatore22 22:25, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.